LIFE IN THE PROMISED LAND IS BACK!
After much time away, I am back online. Please visit joshualegg.com for lots of new stuff, and the return of Life in the Promised Land! Hope to see you there.
After much time away, I am back online. Please visit joshualegg.com for lots of new stuff, and the return of Life in the Promised Land! Hope to see you there.
Sullivan makes a great proposition: he suggests that we mark 19 July as a day to remember the oppression that LGBT persons face the world-over. This week's execution of two gay teens in Tehran is just the latest indication of how much hate our tribe faces on this planet.
I hope the global LGBTQ community will take up Sully's suggestion. We can't ever forget. And, we cannot stop the fight for justice and equality...we cannot stop the fight for our right to simply exist. We're here, we're part of this world, and we are not going away. Ever.
SO, OK. School's not really out. The regaular acaedmic year is over and that means I've had time for a little bit of life this last few weeks, and am catching up on work (both on campus and at home). I actually got things in my home office straightened up and did about 2.5 hours of filing today--I can see the floor, and may sort of be able to find some shit now.
I'm spending the summer session actually taking (advanced poetry) in Harvard's creative writing program. Staff members at the school can get a master's almost for free, so I'm thinking about doing the program. It's only an ALM, not an MFA, but it's a great faculty (an ALM is like an MA).
Have also been logging in a lot of dance-related freelance writing this year...just put two more to bed and have three more to start working on now. So, between that and the time I'm supposed to be writing for the poetry class, I am finally starting to spend the kind of time writing that I've always wanted to spend...although it's certainly not full-time yet.
So, this seems like a good time to dust off the blog for a bit, and maybe reconnect with my old chums online. Missed y'all.

Here's the ad that I designed speaking out against the anti-marriage/anti-family constitutional amendment here in Massachusetts. The amendment was supposed to get a vote earlier this month, but was pushed back till November. The ad ran in 3 sizable publications, including the back page of the Metro, one of the largest dailies in Boston. It was great to see people looking at the ad on the T!
Fuck yes I spin the Chicks. Turns out, they were right. I'll take my ass-kickin', All-American, patriotic music from this powerhouse group everyday. Nuff said.
I'm really becoming fond of Mike Mennonno's column in the Boston Metro. Check out his piece today on the Pew Research Center Social Trends Report, "Are we Happy Yet?" Loved his reaction. Read it here.
Also, check out Mike's other blog, T-Rage, which aims a well deserved arrow in the direction of Boston's T system.
This is a entry is about correlations--correlations for which I would love some empirical evidence...
As a result of the 9/11 trials, the nation is once again rehashing our stand on the death penalty. This is a recurring tennis match that seems in perpetual "volley for serve" mode. I'm noticing though an interesting relationship in conversations I've had recently on this topic: many supporters of the death penalty oppose euthanasia; and conversely, many supporters of assisted suicide/euthanasia oppose the death penalty.
So, on the one hand, you have folks who believe in killing as a form of punishment, but who also rail against the idea of assisted suicide as a way to end suffering. On the other hand you have the opposite where an act that is perceived to end suffering is fine, but one that punishing a heinous crime is some how antithetical to a just society.
As readers of this blog know, I love contradictions and dichotomies. I want to know more about these two groups of persons; and I want to know how members of two different groups can have reverse opinions about two conflicting ideas and still believe at a fundamental level that both of their perceptions are rooted in morality.
How does a moral code allow for taking the life of a criminal, and not for the compassionate ending of suffering? And, how is a compassionate killing any different at the moral level than killing someone who participated in the slaughter of thousands of human beings in a single event?
Then, there's the question of the death penalty and abortion...I'm not even going there today.
But, questions like these are necessary for a society such as our to ponder...and if we are to maintain our sense of morality, we must continually evaluate our beliefs.
And I want a poll on this one.
This posting is part of what may evolve into an ongoing conversation with a reader. Check out the comments in the "America's Dishonor, II" below for Silverbear's full comments. But, I want to address two items:
Precisely what liberties are we taking for granted?...I admire your sentiments, Joshua, but it seems to me that you have bought into the mythology that we live in the promised land despite the fact that in nearly every way America dosen't measure up.
In response to my posting on the Call To Duty Tour, a reader adds:
I'm not near a tour site...but you gotta admire these folks for trying. I used to live in Charlottesville (home of the U. of VA) and their choice of that conservative venue sure indicates that they aren't just trying to preach to the already-converted. So what makes folks like these (and others) want to fight this [the ban]?
Those readers who've stuck around through my periodic postings this last year may remember this story I posted in June 2005. I was on the train platform at the JFK/UMass T stop and watched a mother try to kill her baby by throwing him in front of a train. Fortunately, several of us were able to prevent her from succeeding. The police arrived, took our statements, arrested the mother, and I haven't heard another since.
Well, the wheels of justice are nothing if not unbelievably fucking slow. I was just called to testify for the DA this past Thursday. Of course, the defendant failed to appear. So, I have to go back to court in May to testify...nearly a year after the original attack on this child.
So, while I was in court this Thursday, I provided a statement to the DA's office and the defense attorney...I've had some strange complements in my life, but the defense attorney actually said I'd make a good witness even though I was providing solid support for the DA's case.
Now, this is were things really go from bad to fucking enraging: the charge in this case is only reckless endangerment of a child, which only comes with a 2.5 year maximum sentence in a correctional facility.
The mother threatened to kill her child, and attempted to carry out her threat. How does attempted murder become reckless endangerment?
AND, to top it all off, the defense attorney told me that postpartum depression is the defense...at which point I said, "I watched a mother try to kill her baby. I don't buy that." The defense attorney dropped her head and couldn't look up at me. The look on the DA staffer's face was a priceless shit-eating grin. She was clearly glad I'd said my peace.
The only good news I got Thursday was that the little boy is in protective custody with DSS. Now, I'm not thrilled that this boy is now in the system. But, at least he's safe...but how incredibly sad that he has to be made safe from his own mother.